JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Francisco Luis Giraldo Morales Vs. Intendencia Regional De Manizales De La Superintendencia De Sociedades

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Suspension Del Proceso Liquidatorio Que Ha Dado Origen A La Accion De Tutela De La Referencia. No Se Encuentran Dados Los Supuestos Que Permiten Acceder A La Solicitud Formulada, Pues Ni Siquiera Se Acreditan Los Requisitos Que, En Los Terminos Del Articulo 7º Del Decreto 2591 De 1991, Tornan Viable La Adopcion De Medidas Provisionales Para La Proteccion De Un Derecho. Negada. Se Prosigue El Tramite Hasta Que Se Adopte Sentencia En Sede De Revision.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Proceso Liquidatorio
  • No acceder a la solicitud de suspender el proceso liquidatorio que ha dado origen a la acción de tutela y proseguir el trámite hasta la adopción de la sentencia de Revisión
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. No acceder a la solicitud de suspender el proceso liquidatorio que ha dado origen a la accion de tutela de la referencia y proseguir el tramite hasta la adopcion de la Sentencia de Revision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.